Los Angeles-class attack submarine

Los Angeles-class attack submarine

SSN-688submarine
Country🇺🇸 United States
OperatorUnited States Navy
In Service2
Cost/Hull$900M
First Commissioned1976-11-13
BuilderGeneral Dynamics Electric Boat, Newport News Shipbuilding

Compare with

vs Akula-class submarine (🇷🇺 Russia)
vs Type 093 Shang-class (🇨🇳 China)
vs Trafalgar-class submarine (🇬🇧 United Kingdom)
vs Rubis-class submarine (🇫🇷 France)

Overview

The Los Angeles-class submarine (SSN-688) represents the backbone of the U.S. Navy's attack submarine force and the most numerous nuclear submarine class in history, with 62 boats commissioned between 1976 and 1996. These fast attack submarines were designed during the Cold War to hunt Soviet nuclear submarines and secure sea lanes, featuring a revolutionary design optimized for speed and stealth in deep ocean environments. Strategically, the Los Angeles-class submarines serve as multi-mission platforms capable of anti-submarine warfare (ASW), anti-surface warfare (ASuW), intelligence gathering, special operations support, and land attack missions via Tomahawk cruise missiles. Their nuclear propulsion provides unlimited underwater endurance, allowing them to operate independently for months while maintaining high speeds exceeding 25 knots submerged. The class underwent significant evolution through three distinct flights, with later variants receiving vertical launch systems (VLS) for Tomahawk missiles and improved sonar systems. The 688I (Improved) boats feature enhanced quieting, advanced sonar arrays, and under-ice capabilities that proved crucial during Arctic operations against Soviet submarines. In today's threat environment, these submarines face challenges from advanced diesel-electric boats with air-independent propulsion, sophisticated sonar networks, and anti-submarine warfare systems deployed by near-peer competitors like China and Russia. While newer Virginia-class boats are replacing them, Los Angeles-class submarines continue operating in critical roles across the Pacific, Atlantic, and Mediterranean, with approximately 25-30 boats remaining in active service as of 2024. Their combat-proven design and Tomahawk strike capability make them valuable assets for power projection and deterrence operations.

Deployment Map

EQUATORWESTERN PACIFICSOUTH CHINA SEAMEDITERRANEANNORTH ATLANTICARABIAN SEAGrotonPearl Harbor
Home ports (2 hulls)
Typical operating areas
Unmapped: Decommissioned (1)

Home ports from known hull assignments. Operating areas reflect typical AORs — individual deployments will vary.

Timeline

CommissionVariantCombat useModernization
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
1976
First commissioned
1976
Flight I
1988
688I (Improved)
1991
Operation Desert Storm
1994
Flight III (688I Advanced)
1999
Operation Allied Force
1999
ARCI (Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion)
2000
Life extension programs
2001
Operation Enduring Freedom
2003
Operation Iraqi Freedom
2018
Syria Strikes
2018
Communications upgrades
2020
Retirement acceleration

Specifications

6,927t
Displacement
109.7m
Length
10.1m
Beam
9.4m
Draft
25 kn
Speed
Unlimited (nuclear)
Range
129
Crew
12
VLS Cells
450m
Dive Depth
4
Torpedo Tubes
26
Torpedo Room
Propulsion: 1x S6G pressurized water reactor, 1x steam turbine, 35,000 shp
Radar: BPS-15A/16 surface search radar
Sonar: AN/BQQ-5D/E sonar suite, TB-16/23 towed array sonar
Combat System: AN/BSY-1 combat system

Armament

BGM-109 TomahawkCruise Missiles
up to 12 (VLS boats)1600km range

VLS-equipped boats only (SSN-719 and later)

Mk 48 ADCAPTorpedoes
up to 26 weapons38km range

Primary anti-submarine and anti-ship weapon

UGM-84 HarpoonAnti-ship missiles
tube-launched124km range

Tube-launched from torpedo room

Various naval minesMines
in lieu of torpedoes

Mine laying capability

Doctrine & Employment

Role

Multi-domain sea control and power projection through submarine warfare, designed to hunt Soviet nuclear submarines in the deep ocean while maintaining American naval supremacy during the Cold War.

Design Philosophy

Designers prioritized speed and deep-ocean acoustics over shallow-water maneuverability and payload flexibility, accepting a single-hull design that sacrificed survivability for hydrodynamic efficiency. The emphasis on sustained high-speed pursuit of Soviet submarines led to powerful S6G reactors but constrained internal volume for future weapons upgrades. Hull form optimized for blue-water operations rather than littoral warfare that would define post-Cold War requirements.

Employment

Typically deployed individually or in small groups for independent operations, unlike surface task forces. Primary mission profiles include anti-submarine warfare (ASW) patrols in Soviet bastions, intelligence gathering near adversary coastlines, and Tomahawk land-attack missions. Command relationships flow directly from fleet commanders, with submarines operating under EMCON for weeks while maintaining strategic mobility across ocean basins. Later variants integrated into joint strike operations as precision land-attack platforms.

Threat Context

Designed specifically to counter Soviet nuclear submarines in the GIUK gap and Pacific bastions, when submarine-versus-submarine warfare was the primary mission. The threat environment has evolved toward multi-domain littoral operations against advanced diesel-electric submarines, anti-submarine warfare by peer competitors, and integrated air-sea denial systems that challenge traditional submarine operating areas.

How to Compare

Compare on sustained submerged speed and sonar capabilities rather than weapons payload—the Los Angeles-class prioritized hunter-killer performance over strike capacity until later variants. Acoustic signature and deep-ocean endurance matter more than shallow-water agility when evaluating against Soviet and Russian contemporaries. Magazine depth became critical only after Tomahawk integration shifted the class toward land-attack missions.

Operational Patterns

Typical Deployment

Independent patrols, intelligence gathering, power projection, and hunter-killer missions

Deployment Length

6 months

Typical Task Group

Usually operate independently, occasionally with carrier strike groups

Readiness

Aging boats face increased maintenance requirements and reduced operational availability

Key Operating Areas

Western PacificSouth China SeaMediterraneanNorth AtlanticArabian Sea

Peer Comparison Matrix

Akula-class submarine🇷🇺 Russiadirect rival

Akula boats are quieter and have double-hull design, but Los Angeles-class has superior sonar and combat systems. Akula has larger weapon load but less advanced fire control.

Video angle: Cold War submarine rivalry - which design philosophy proved superior in the long run?

Type 093 Shang-class🇨🇳 Chinacurrent rival

Shang-class based on Soviet technology but newer, potentially quieter than early 688s but likely inferior to 688I boats. Limited operational experience compared to battle-tested Los Angeles-class.

Video angle: Old warrior vs new challenger - can experience overcome technological advancement?

Trafalgar-class submarine🇬🇧 United Kingdomallied equivalent

Smaller and more specialized for European operations, excellent sonar but less multi-mission capability. No VLS system but very quiet design optimized for shallow water operations.

Video angle: Allied submarine design philosophies - specialist vs generalist approaches

Rubis-class submarine🇫🇷 Franceallied equivalent

Much smaller nuclear attack boat designed for Mediterranean and coastal operations. Limited endurance and weapon capacity but highly maneuverable and cost-effective for regional missions.

Video angle: Size matters - large ocean patrol boats vs compact regional defenders

Combat History

1991-01Operation Desert Storm

USS Louisville (SSN-724) and USS Pittsburgh (SSN-720) launched first submarine-fired Tomahawk cruise missiles in combat, striking targets in Iraq

Demonstrated submarine land-attack capability and Tomahawk effectiveness

1999-03Operation Allied Force

USS Miami (SSN-755) fired Tomahawk missiles against Serbian targets during Kosovo campaign

Proved continued relevance of submarine-launched land attack capability

2001-10Operation Enduring Freedom

Multiple Los Angeles-class submarines launched Tomahawks into Afghanistan from Arabian Sea, including USS Providence and USS Key West

Showcased rapid power projection from sea-based platforms

2003-03Operation Iraqi Freedom

USS Cheyenne (SSN-773), USS Montpelier (SSN-765), and USS Providence fired over 100 Tomahawks in opening strikes

Largest submarine missile salvo in naval history at the time

2018-04Syria Strikes

USS John Warner (SSN-785) - actually Virginia-class, but Los Angeles boats were involved in 2017 strikes on Shayrat airfield

Continued use in precision strike missions

Known Vulnerabilities

Acoustic signature

Earlier Flight I boats are significantly louder than modern Russian and Chinese submarines, reducing stealth advantage

Context: Advanced diesel-electric boats with AIP systems can be quieter than Los Angeles-class boats

Mitigation: Quieter 688I boats still in service, but fundamental design limitations remain

Limited weapons capacity

Only 26 weapon spaces total, forcing difficult trade-offs between torpedoes, missiles, and mines

Context: Modern threats require diverse weapon loads, but capacity constraints limit flexibility

Mitigation: Careful mission planning and weapon selection based on threat environment

Aging systems

30+ year old boats with legacy systems face increasing maintenance challenges and reduced reliability

Context: Parts obsolescence and fatigue issues affect operational availability

Mitigation: Selective upgrades and increased maintenance, but retirement is the ultimate solution

Single hull design

More vulnerable to catastrophic flooding than double-hull designs if compromised

Context: Modern anti-submarine weapons and underwater hazards pose greater risks

Mitigation: Enhanced damage control training and procedures

Variants

VariantDesignationYearsCountStatusKey Changes
Flight ISSN-688 to SSN-7181976-198931retiredOriginal design with BQQ-5 sonar, no VLS, limited under-ice capability
688I (Improved)SSN-719 to SSN-7501988-199523active12-cell VLS for Tomahawk, BSY-1 combat system, improved quieting, reinforced sail for under-ice operations
Flight III (688I Advanced)SSN-751 to SSN-7731994-19968activeAdvanced BSY-1 combat system, improved TB-23 towed array, enhanced quieting measures

Fleet Roster (3)

HullNameVariantCommissionedHome PortStatus
SSN-688USS Los AngelesFlight I1976-11-13Decommissionedretired
SSN-719USS Providence688I1985-07-27Groton, CTactive
SSN-773USS CheyenneFlight III1996-09-13Pearl Harbor, HIactive

Modernization Programmes

ARCI (Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion)

completed1999-2015

Upgraded sonar processing systems with commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software, improved detection capabilities

Impact: Significantly enhanced sonar processing power and detection ranges

Communications upgrades

in-progress2018-2025

Installation of new satellite communication systems and network capabilities for improved connectivity

Impact: Better integration with joint operations and real-time intelligence sharing

Life extension programs

completed2000-2020

Hull and mechanical upgrades to extend service life of 688I boats beyond 30 years

Impact: Extended service life to bridge capability gap until Virginia-class production increases

Retirement acceleration

in-progress2020-2030

Accelerated decommissioning of remaining boats as Virginia-class production ramps up

Impact: Force structure transition to more capable platforms

Images

Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine
Los Angeles-class attack submarine

Recent News

Frequently Asked

How many Los Angeles-class attack submarine are in service?

2 Los Angeles-class attack submarine are currently in service with United States Navy.

When was the first Los Angeles-class attack submarine commissioned?

The first Los Angeles-class attack submarine entered service in 1976-11-13.

Who builds the Los Angeles-class attack submarine?

The Los Angeles-class attack submarine is built by General Dynamics Electric Boat, Newport News Shipbuilding.

What variants of the Los Angeles-class attack submarine exist?

Known variants include: Flight I, 688I (Improved), Flight III (688I Advanced).

How much does a Los Angeles-class attack submarine cost?

Unit cost is approximately $900M per hull.

Curated Research

essential

U.S. Cold War Nuclear Attack Submarines by Norman Friedmanbook

Definitive technical and doctrinal analysis of Los Angeles-class development within Cold War submarine warfare strategy.

Comprehensive analysis of U.S. attack submarine force structure including Los Angeles-class modernization and replacement planning.

recommended

Submarine Warfare, Cold War Style by John Jordanarticle

Operational context for Los Angeles-class employment during the Cold War submarine confrontation with the Soviet Navy.

Leading open-source submarine analyst providing technical updates and comparative analysis of nuclear attack submarines.

The Silent War: The Cold War Battle Beneath the Sea by John Pina Cravenbook

First-hand account of U.S. submarine operations and the strategic context that shaped Los Angeles-class requirements.

reference

Comprehensive technical specifications and individual boat histories for the entire Los Angeles-class program.

Modern threat context showing how peer submarine capabilities challenge traditional U.S. submarine dominance established by the Los Angeles-class.

Watch Los Angeles in Action

Iron Command produces in-depth comparison and analysis videos for military equipment.

Watch on YouTube