BMP-3 Infantry Fighting Vehicle

BMP-3 Infantry Fighting Vehicle

BMP-3apc
CountryπŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί Russia
OperatorRussian Ground Forces
In Service2000
Cost/Hull$3M
First Commissioned1987
BuilderKurganmashzavod

Compare with

vs M2A3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle (πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States)
vs CV90 Infantry Fighting Vehicle ( Sweden)
vs Puma Infantry Fighting Vehicle (πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Germany)

Overview

The BMP-3 represents Russia's third-generation infantry fighting vehicle, designed to transport mechanized infantry while providing substantial fire support through its unique dual-cannon armament configuration. Introduced in 1987, the BMP-3 was conceived during the late Soviet era to address the limitations of its predecessors, particularly the need for better amphibious capability and enhanced firepower against both armored and soft targets. The vehicle's most distinctive feature is its armament layout: a 100mm 2A70 semi-automatic rifled gun capable of firing both conventional high-explosive rounds and 9M117 Bastion anti-tank guided missiles, complemented by a coaxial 30mm 2A72 autocannon. This configuration allows the BMP-3 to engage main battle tanks at extended ranges while maintaining rapid-fire capability against lighter targets and infantry. Strategically, the BMP-3 reflects Russian mechanized warfare doctrine emphasizing amphibious operations and combined-arms tactics. Its full amphibious capability with water-jet propulsion enables rapid river crossings and coastal assault operations without engineering support. The vehicle's low silhouette and relatively advanced fire control system for its era made it a significant capability leap over the BMP-1 and BMP-2. In today's threat environment, the BMP-3 faces challenges from modern anti-tank guided missiles and top-attack munitions, particularly given recent combat performance in Ukraine where older Russian IFV designs have shown vulnerability to Western-supplied systems. However, ongoing modernization programs aim to address these deficiencies through improved armor packages, active protection systems, and enhanced situational awareness capabilities. The platform remains relevant as export models continue to see combat use globally, from Middle Eastern conflicts to Southeast Asian militaries.

Specifications

18.7t
Displacement
7.14m
Length
3.2m
Beam
1.8m
Draft
6 kn
Speed
324 nm
Range
10
Crew
0
VLS Cells
Propulsion: UTD-29 diesel engine, 500 hp, tracked with water-jet propulsion
Radar: No primary radar system
Combat System: 1K13-2 fire control system with laser rangefinder

Armament

2A70 100mm gun/launcherMain Gun
1x 100mm7km range

Fires HE-FRAG and 9M117 Bastion ATGMs

2A72 30mm autocannonAutocannon
1x 30mm2km range

Coaxial mount, 500 rounds

PKT 7.62mm machine gunMachine Gun
1x 7.62mm1km range

Bow-mounted, operated by driver

9M117 Bastion ATGMMissiles
8 ready rounds4km range

SACLOS guidance, 550mm RHA penetration

Combat History

1991Soviet Army trials

First operational deployment during Soviet-era exercises, revealing initial mechanical reliability issues and crew training challenges

Identified need for improved crew ergonomics and maintenance procedures

1999-2009Second Chechen War

BMP-3s deployed in urban combat operations, suffering losses to RPGs and improvised explosive devices

Demonstrated vulnerability to asymmetric threats and need for urban warfare modifications

2008Russo-Georgian War

Russian BMP-3s participated in the advance into South Ossetia and Abkhazia, primarily in fire support roles

First major interstate conflict deployment, validated amphibious crossing capabilities

2015-presentSyrian Civil War

Russian BMP-3s deployed with special forces units, used for base security and limited offensive operations

Combat testing of modernized variants in desert environment

2022-presentRussia-Ukraine War

Extensive deployment of BMP-3s in Ukrainian theater, suffering significant losses to Javelin, NLAW, and other Western ATGMs

Exposed critical vulnerabilities to modern top-attack munitions and highlighted inadequate active protection systems

Known Vulnerabilities

Top-attack munitions defense

Minimal roof armor (typically 6-10mm) makes BMP-3 extremely vulnerable to modern top-attack ATGMs like Javelin, NLAW, and artillery-delivered submunitions

Mitigation: Active protection system integration planned but not yet fielded in significant numbers

Crew survivability

Ammunition storage layout and fuel placement create significant risk of catastrophic explosion when penetrated, with limited crew escape options

Mitigation: Some newer variants feature improved ammunition storage but fundamental layout constraints remain

Electronic warfare susceptibility

Older variants lack modern electronic countermeasures and digital communications are vulnerable to jamming and interception

Mitigation: Manul upgrade addresses some issues but many vehicles in service lack modern EW protection

Maintenance complexity

Dual-cannon system and amphibious capability create maintenance burden, particularly for water-jet propulsion and complex fire control systems

Mitigation: Training improvements and parts availability programs show mixed results

Variants

VariantDesignationYearsCountStatus
BMP-3 (Object 688M)Original production model1987-1990s700active
BMP-3MModernized variant2005-present400active
BMP-3FNaval infantry variant1990s-present200active
BMP-3 ManulLatest modernization2020-present50building

Watch BMP-3 Infantry Fighting Vehicle in Action

Iron Command produces in-depth comparison and analysis videos for military equipment.

Watch on YouTube